
Allegory of Music
François Boucher·1764
Historical Context
Allegory of Music at the National Gallery of Art (1764) personifies the art that was most central to French Rococo culture — music, which permeated aristocratic life from the evening concerts at Versailles through the street musicians of Paris. Boucher's allegory pairs with the National Gallery's Allegory of Painting (1765) as companion works that together celebrate two of the sister arts. The personification of Music typically carried a lute, harp, or other instrument alongside musical notation, and her physical beauty embodied the sensory pleasure that music was understood to provide. Boucher made these late allegories with the same technical assurance that characterized his entire career, his brushwork as fluent and his palette as harmonious in his early sixties as in his forties. The National Gallery's acquisition of these companion allegories as a pair reflects their original decorative function, where matched works created visual dialogue across a room's architecture.
Technical Analysis
The musical instruments are rendered with careful descriptive detail within the overall decorative composition. Boucher's characteristic soft palette and elegant figure design create a harmonious image that itself suggests musical beauty.
Look Closer
- ◆The personification of Music holds a lute or lyre rendered with specific instrument detail including visible strings and tuning pegs.
- ◆Putti surrounding Music play miniature versions of the adult instruments above them, creating a hierarchy of musical engagement.
- ◆Boucher's color harmony pairs warm flesh against cool drapery — the figure's warmth surrounded by blues and greens that set off her golden tones.
- ◆The ceiling or overdoor format means the work was designed to be viewed from below — the figures consequently tilted upward to meet the viewer's gaze.
Provenance
Possibly Maximilian III Joseph, Elector of Bavaria [1745-1777]. Traditionally said to have been brought into France by the early 19th century by Général de Saint-Maurice. M. Maillet du Boullay, Paris; (his sale, Hôtel Drouot, Paris, 22 January 1870, no. 1); M. Féral. Gustave Rothan, Paris, by 1874;[1] (his sale, Galerie Georges Petit, Paris, 29-31 May 1890, no. 122). Adèle, 4th duchesse de Dino [née Adèle Livingston Sampson, 1841-1912; married first to Frederick W. Stevens], Paris, by 1907; probably by inheritance to her daughter, Countess Mabel Stevens Orlowski [married 1891 to Count Mieczyslaw Orlowski (1865-1929)];[2] (Wildenstein & Co., Inc., Paris, New York, and London); sold 1942 to the Samuel H. Kress Foundation, New York;[3] gift 1946 to NGA. [1] The early provenance of this painting and NGA 1946.7.1 is based on tradition rather than documentary evidence, and derives from Paul Mantz, "La Galerie de M. Rothan," _Gazette des Beaux-Arts_ (1873): 442, who believed the pair had been painted for the Elector of Bavaria, Maximilian III Joseph. They were then supposedly returned to France in the early nineteenth century by General de Saint-Maurice, who, according to André Michel, _François Boucher_, Paris, n.d.[1906]: 51, kept them for some sixty years before selling them to Maillet du Boullay. As Alastair Laing has pointed out, however, Saint-Maurice never served in Bavaria and died in 1796 (letter of 20 April 1997 to Richard Rand). Nor do any references to the paintings appear in the state archives of Bavaria; see Colin Eisler, _Paintings from the Samuel H. Kress Collection: European Schools Excluding Italian_, Oxford, 1977: 318, who offered the possibility that they were commissioned by Joseph von Dufresne, a courtier of the Elector who had a large collection of French pictures (see also correspondence in NGA curatorial files). Mantz writes that Rothan acquired the pair of paintings in 1870, probably at Maillet du Boullay's sale; Rothan certainly owned them by 1874, when he lent them to an exhibition in Paris. [2] The Wildenstein prospectus for the pair of paintings listed the last three owners as Mme. Livingston-Sampson, Duchesse de Dino, and Comte Orllowski [_sic_]. Research for the Gallery's systematic catalogue of 15th-18th century French paintings determined that the first two names were the same person, and that the Count was her son-in-law. See NGA curatorial files for the prospectus and documentation of the family history. [3] See also The Kress Collection Digital Archive, https://kress.nga.gov/Detail/objects/194.
_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg&width=600)






